9885
9909
Women with Baby Orienteering
MTBO Starters
JWOC 2019 Relay
Lonely Mountain Sprints
WOC – Promotion and relegation – where we start in 2016
By Malcolm Ingham - Sun 16 Aug 2015 5:26pm
,

Although we naturally tend to look at individual results in the WOC races, just as important are the overall standing of the men’s and women’s teams as these dictate how many runners we will be allowed in the Middle and Long distance races at the next WOC. Nations are divided into 3 groups. The 8 nations in Group 1 (positions 1-8) are entitled to 3 runners in each race, the 14 in Group 2 (positions 9-22) get 2 runners in each, while the remainder, in group 3, have only 1 entrant in each of the Middle and Long. Clearly, where we sit in this ranking has important implications for the opportunity for our athletes to even compete at WOC. At the start of WOC2015 NZL men were in Group 3 and the women were in Group 2. Fortunately, Matt Ogden and Lizze Ingham’s Oceania Middle distance titles won in January allowed them as extra starters in the middle distance at WOC2015.

Points are gained according to finishing position in not only the middle and long distance races, but also in the relay. At the start of WOC 2015 nations in Group 1 had the points total acquired by their top 2 runners and relay team in 2014, nations in Group 2 and 3 had the points from their top finisher in the middle and long in 2014 as well as their relay points. To these are then added the points gained in the 2015 relay and those gained by the best 3 runners for Group 1 nations, 2 runners for Group 2 nations, and the single runner for Group 3 nations, in each of the 2015 middle and long distance races. At the end of WOC the bottom team in Group 1 is relegated and replaced by the top team in Group 2, while there is a 2 down-2 up relegation/promotion between Groups 2 and 3.

Now that the dust has settled and there has been time to do the calculations, here are the team standing at the end of WOC2015. First the Men.

Men2014MiddleLongRelayTotal
1SUI5002062252401171
2FRA386194243130953
3NOR422168180160930
4SWE45016411296822
5CZE28314668106603
6FIN26112612672585
7UKR2218411480499
8RUS253783756424Relegated
9GBR1869287114479Promoted
10EST1788277100437
11AUT190747484422
12DEN159557364351
13LTU126675692341
14LAT114736276325
15BUL127404088295
16POL135347148288
17HUN88443568235
18GER128222144215
19ITA126282532211
20BLR114132736190
21AUS110312024185Relegated
22IRL3724728114Relegated
23ESP9823352176Promoted
24NZL44351560154Promoted
25BEL61201740138
26SVK752095
27POR411461677
28CRO29161358
29ROU49655
30JPN158831
31USA1221226
32CAN612422
33SLO1313
34TUR55
35ISR213
36MDA11
37BRA00
38CHN00
39KAZ00

 

As can be seen NZL has succeeded in being promoted from Group 3 to Group 2 (while the Australians went down!). This will give us 2 starters in both the middle and long distance races at WOC2016 in Sweden. While Matt’s performances in the middle and long were obviously crucial, the real game-breaker was the 16th place in the relay. This gave us 20 more points than Belgium who were, otherwise, the most likely candidates for promotion. The relay result was even more creditable when you consider that Gene Beveridge was drafted in only at the last minute after Tim Robertson’s injury in the middle distance, and both Gene and Shamus Morrison were running in their first WOC relay.

Now the women:

Women2014MiddleLongRelayTotal
1SWE4902551471301022
2DEN400149146240935
3SUI498128143106875
4NOR365130204160859
5FIN31018691114701
6RUS315129194638
7CZE246117110100573
8LAT191948396464Relegated
9GBR1911099288480Promoted
10FRA154607292378
11UKR159876860374
12LTU152705476352
13AUS154476552318
14NZL117635268300
15CAN134446948295
16EST107484680281
17AUT140305356279
18POL149463836269
19GER102354164242
20USA11123644193
21ITA83151228138Relegated
22JPN251641Relegated
23HUN99163084229Promoted
24ESP85221772196Promoted
25POR39122475
26BUL2853265
27IRL134053
28CHN24321241
29SLO1812039
30SVK7141031
31BLR2727
32ROU13821
33MDA611118
34HKG88
35=BEL44
35=RSA134
37SRB11
38TUR    0
39BRA    0
40KAZ    0

 

Having only been promoted for this year the NZl women finished comfortably in the middle of Group 2 thanks again to strong performances from Lizzie, good support from Laura Robertson in the middle and long, and also a great relay result. Once more Laura and Renee Beveridge were running in the first WOC relay so the 14th place was highly creditable.

Equally important, however, are the points and palces both the men and women will start with in Group 2 next year. These will have a crucial bearing on the chances of staying in group 2, and possibly edging towards Group 1.

As can be seen, the position is quite positive. Althouhg only just having been promoted the NZL men will start WOC2016 about a tghird of the way up Group 2. Performances similar to this year would almost certainly retain Group 2 status and likely improve it slightly. The women are a bit better off and will start 2016 on an equal footing with our trans-Tasman neighbours. The 60 point gap to Latvia at the top of group 2 ius probably a little too big to overcome, but continued improvement could put Group 1on the horizon.

MenTotalWomenTotal
9EST1979LAT201
10AUT17410UKR173
11LTU16011FRA172
12LAT15612LTU156
13BUL15613EST148
14DEN14214=NZL143
15RUS13214=AUS143
16HUN11816HUN130
17=POL11017GER119
17=NZL11018CAN114
19GER8019ESP111
20ESP7820POL107
21BLR7121AUT105
22ITA7022USA66

 

So where does this leave us? Clearly there has been a big improvement over the last two years. However, as retaining and improving status is base don 2 years results it does mean that we cannot afford a year with a weaker WOC team. This may mean that there needs to be a rethink both of selection policy, to maximise results, and the approach to WOC by the athletes themselves – no longer are they running solely for an individual result.

The landscape is also changing. The Extraordinary General meeting of IOF at WOC2015 voted that from 2019 WOC will alternate between a forest WOC in odd years and an urban (sprint) WOC in even years. It is likely, but not yet assured, that for the forest WOC some form of qualification will be brought back for at least the middle distance. This change too, however, is going to challenge our thinking and our approach to WOC selection..

Share this on:

LOGIN